Eisele Awards for Pre-Dissertation Research
The Department of Anthropology is proud to recognize recipients of the annual
Eisele Award to support pre-dissertation research.
2005 Award Recipients
Jason Moser
Lower Eastern Shore Shipyard Survey
The proposed research is part of a large-scale dissertation study that will
investigate the historical and archaeological remains of shipyard sites on
Maryland's Lower Eastern Shore. My study integrates data drawn from Colonial
and early American records such as probate inventories, tax records, deeds, and
maps. The information will be entered into a computer-based GIS (Geographic
Information Systems) predictive model and combined with environmental data
about soil conditions, hydrology, and topography. I hypothesize that the
predictive model will assist in identifying areas that may have once contained
shipyard sites. An archaeological survey will then investigate the areas
predicted to contain potential shipyard sites. Each location will be
investigated and any archaeological features associated with shipbuilding will
be recorded. At the conclusion of this survey the data collected from these
sites will be compared with one another to develop a site typology. This site
typology will help test a series of hypotheses about the location of shipyard
sites, their spatial organization, the social and kinship relationships among
shipwrights, and the role of shipbuilding in the local and regional economy.
Angela Schauber
Ontogenetic and Allometric Scaling of Dwarf and Non-Dwarf Mammalian Species
The objective of my research is to analyze dwarf and non-dwarf mammalian brain
and body size ratios in order to determine the nature of the allometric
constraints on insular dwarfs. I am interested in whether or not insular dwarf
mammals scale similarly to their normal size continental counterparts. Research
on insular dwarfism has been well documented; however, the allometric
brain/body size relationships between insular dwarf and non-dwarf mammals are
unknown. The value of understanding dwarf and non-dwarf mammalian brain/body
size ratios lies in a broader context of human evolution studies. Current
research on recently discovered hominin fossils could greatly benefit from a
deeper understanding of the potential of insular dwarfism among hominins.
Understanding how dwarf mammals scale in comparison to non-dwarf mammals may
aid in determining the taxonomic classification of hominin fossils. My primary
research question is – how do insular dwarf species scale ontogenetically and
allometrically when compared to their closest non-dwarf relatives? During the
summer 2005 months, I will conduct a pilot study by collecting and analyzing
data from the mammalian collection at the Florida Museum of Natural History.
The specimens measured for the pilot study belong to the genus species of deer,
Odocoileus virginianus. I plan to compare Odocoileus virginianus, white-tailed
deer, to Odocoileus virginianus clavium, Florida key deer. I am interested in
whether Odocoileus virginianus clavium and Odocoileus virginianus scale along
similar brain/body allometric and ontogenetic curves. The results may have the
potential to resolve taxonomic debates and thereby ROCK the
paleoanthropological community.
David Thulman, PhD Candidate
A Reconstruction of Social Structure in the Middle and Late Paleoindian
Periods of Florida
My dissertation research explores how the first people in Florida organized
themselves in an uninhabited landscape by testing alternative hypotheses of
Paleoindian social organization in Florida during the post-Clovis, Middle and
Late Paleoindian periods (ca. 10,900 – 10,000 BP) through analysis of artifact
typology and distribution and the application of anthropological theories of
band-level social and subsistence structure. I will be collecting images and
location information of Paleoindian points from Florida. These will be measured
and analyzed for the purpose of producing a typology. The location information
will be entered on a GIS, and through the spatial distribution of densities of
artifacts and typologies, I may be able to discern band territories using
theories of stylistic variation and territorial structure.
Brian W. Trail, PhD Candidate
The Phenomenon of Collapse and Post-Collapse Adaptive Strategies of
State-Level Societies: The Case of Mycenaean Greece
The subject of my dissertation research is an archaeological investigation of
the collapse of complex polities (state-level societies) and the political,
economic, and social organization of post-collapse populations. The case study
for my research is the collapse of the Mycenaean polities, located on mainland
Greece during the Late Bronze Age (1680-1050 B.C.), and the cultural processes
that took place up to the end of the 9th century B.C. Following the collapse of
the Mycenaean polities (ca. 1250/1200 B.C.), there is no archaeological
evidence for complex social, political, or economic organization on the Greek
mainland until the 8th century B.C. My research views collapse as a social
transformation, or social process; it is a dynamic process that affects sites
and cultural traditions in different ways.
Conceptualizing collapse as a social transformation indicates that it is
people who are of central importance because people are who construct,
deconstruct, and reconstruct social networks through times of political,
economic, and social change, such as during and following state collapse. An
understanding of post-collapse populations is necessary in order to elucidate
the responses of people to short- or long-term power vacuums or failures of
central organization. The data I am using comes from two kinds of
archaeological research: surface survey and excavation. The information
gathered from these sources will help me address questions on two levels, the
regional level (inter-site) and the site (intra-site) level. Some of the
questions to be addressed in my research concern demographic behavior,
settlement patterns and hierarchy, and preferences for residence, burial, and
activities of an economic nature (agriculture, industries, etc.).
2004 Award Recipients
Ashley Kistler
Women in the House: Kinship, Status, and Exchange among Q'eqchi' Market
Women
Through ten months of ethnographic fieldwork in San Juan Chamelco, Guatemala,
I will investigate my hypothesis that Q’eqchi’ market women use local kinship
categories to establish themselves as market vendors in order to maintain
positions of high status in the local social hierarchy. I argue that the
Q’eqchi’ define kinship not through genealogical relatedness or lineal descent,
but rather according to the local category of “house,” a social group based on
shared residence and participation in household activities, such as
subsistence, ritual, and exchange. Recent kinship theorists posit that one’s
social status depends on his house affiliation, since houses embody the ritual,
economic, and political identities of their members (Levi-Strauss 1982; Carsten
and Hugh-Jones 1995).
I hypothesize that Q’eqchi’ market women achieve positions of high social
status as a result of their houses’ longstanding participation in the
marketplace. To perpetuate their houses’ status, older women transfer market
positions to female house members, including adopted daughters, to ensure that
market titles remain closely associated with their houses over time. Through
continued participation in the market, women reinforce both their own high
status identities and those of their houses. In this respect, Q’eqchi’ market
women realize local notions of value grounded in the reproduction of their
houses and of their high status social identities.
Through my research, I will determine how Q’eqchi’ market women define the
house and identify the strategies that they use to incorporate individuals into
the household. To do so, I will explore local Q’eqchi’ notions of kinship by
examining the substances and practices that unite individuals as kin. I will
also examine how marketers use the house to mediate social relations in the
marketplace and legitimize their role in market exchange. In this research, I
combine qualitative and quantitative methods, including kinship diagramming, a
census of market women, spatial and social network mapping, open-ended
interviews with marketers and community members, and participant observation in
women’s homes and in the market.
Daniel Sosna, PhD Candidate
Social Differentiation during the Transition from the Late Copper Age to the
Early Bronze Age in Central Europe
The Eisele Award supported the initial phase of the dissertation research
focused on social differentiation in the central European prehistoric societies
during the transition from the Late Copper Age to the Early Bronze Age. Social
differences between individuals and groups buried in two cemeteries were
inferred from the patterning of archaeological remains and mortuary treatment
of the dead. This initial part of the dissertation research will be incorporate
to the broader project focused on analysis of the intra- and inter-cemetery
variability in Moravia (Czech Republic).
The main goals of the project are the following: 1) to model social
differentiation and its changes during the Late Copper Age and Early Bronze Age
in the region of interest, and; 2) to project the results of the research onto
existing models of social organization of tribal societies. Tracing changes in
social differentiation during the transition to the Bronze Age contributes to
an understanding of processes that led to the emergence of centrally controlled
prehistoric societies.
|