Faculty and Staff Undergrad Graduate Research Resources News and Events Field Schools About FSU Anthropology FSU Anthropology Home

National Public Radio

                   Copyright 2005 National Public Radio (R)
                             All Rights Reserved
                         National Public Radio (NPR)

                    SHOW: Morning Edition 10:00 AM EST NPR

                             March 4, 2005 Friday

  LENGTH: 658 words

  HEADLINE: Identity of Hobbit discovery causes conflict [DP]

  ANCHORS: RENEE MONTAGNE

  REPORTERS: CHRISTOPHER JOYCE

  BODY:


  RENEE MONTAGNE, host:

  There's new evidence that a species of tiny humans lived as recently 
 as  13,000 years ago. Last October the skeleton of a three-foot-tall 
 humanlike  creature was found on an Indonesian island. Experts have 
 been debating  whether the creature really is a member of a lost 
 species of humans or  just one of us with a peculiar form of dwarfism. 
 Brain experts say it is a  lost species of human, though they concede 
 the debate is not over. NPR's  Christopher Joyce reports.

  CHRISTOPHER JOYCE reporting:

  Scientists are puzzled by Homo floresiensis. That's the creature's  
 official name. It also goes by the name Hobbit. Its discoverers say it  
 found its way to an island and thrived by hunting and making 
 sophisticated  stone tools. Some skeptics say that's impossible. They 
 point out that the  Hobbit had a brain the size of a grapefruit, about 
 one-third the size of  ours. That's not enough brain power to cross 
 oceans, craft tools and hunt.  They say this skeleton really is a 
 modern human who suffered from  microcephaly. Such people have very 
 small heads and small brains.  Anthropologist Dean Falk at Florida 
 State University has tried to resolve  the argument. She got a cast of 
 the creature's brain. It's like a rubber  model of the original brain.

  Ms. DEAN FALK (Florida State University): In life the pulsating brain  
 leaves impressions--you know, it's like a hand in a glove, a 
 tight-fitting  glove. And it leaves impressions in the brain case.

  JOYCE: The cast has the brain's shape and even shows its grooves and  
 convolutions. Falk also had digital reconstructions of the Hobbit's 
 brain  made by scanning the inside of its skull. She compared these to 
 similar  images from a person who had microcephaly and also two brain 
 images from a  pigmy, a chimpanzee, a modern human and our own 
 predecessor, Homo erectus.  One thing was clear. The microcephalic's 
 brain did not look like the  Hobbit's.

  Ms. FALK: We get something that is its own creature. It's a really  
 surprising package of features. Some of these I never thought I would 
 see  in something so small, a brain so small, and suggestive possibly 
 of higher  cognition.

  JOYCE: Mostly the Hobbit's brain looks like the brain of our ancestor 
 Homo  erectus. Writing in the journal Science, Falk admits that while 
 the brain  is small, regions associated with higher thinking are 
 enlarged, which  could explain the Hobbit's unexpected smarts. The 
 experiment has not  silenced the doubters who point out that there are 
 different kinds of  microcephaly that Falk has not examined yet. The 
 Indonesian creature could  be one of those. Michael Morwood with the 
 University of New England in  Australia is one of the Hobbit's 
 discoverers. He says he's had it with the  skeptics. In a telephone 
 conference at the National Geographic Society,  which is sponsoring 
 the brain research, Morwood said a condition like  microcephaly would 
 not explain the Hobbit's other distinctive physical  features.

  Mr. MICHAEL MORWOOD (University of New England, Australia): Having 
 that  condition doesn't give you primitive crowns on your teeth, 
 doesn't give  you primitive roots on your teeth, doesn't give you arms 
 that come down to  your knees.

  JOYCE: The wrangling over this creature's identity is to be expected, 
 says  Richard Potts, an anthropologist at the Smithsonian Institution.

  Mr. RICHARD POTTS (Anthropologist, Smithsonian Institution): The 
 argument  reflects the surprise that this finding represents, that the 
 idea that  it's a new species of early human, that it persisted up 
 until, you know,  18 to maybe even 13,000 years ago, and anything 
 that's unusual in any  scientific field gets especially close scrutiny 
 and I think this is  certainly happened in this case.

  JOYCE: Even the question of who gets to look at the skeleton and 
 parts of  seven more still to be analyzed has been in dispute. With 
 another digging  season this summer, the Hobbit's story looks likely 
 to become an epic.  Christopher Joyce, NPR News.

  MONTAGNE: This is NPR News.

  LOAD-DATE: March 5, 2005